You have two brochures open in two tabs. One fund shows 14.2% over five years, and the other shows 13.6%. You are about to pick the first one because it’s a bigger number, and that is how comparison is supposed to work.
Except you have just compared the wrong thing.
Both funds probably hold roughly the same forty large-cap stocks. The gap between them is mostly an accident of which quarter each was measured from. What you actually needed to compare was never on that page.
Why Do Past Returns Tell You Almost Nothing Here?
A unit-linked insurance plan (ULIP) is a wrapper. Inside it sits a fund investing in the same market as every other fund. If both plans offer a large-cap option drawing from a similar universe, gross returns converge over any long period.
However, the cost does not converge. Charges are contractual, fixed in the policy document, and they apply every year regardless of what the market does. A fund can beat its peer by 0.6% in one five-year window and lose by 0.6% in the next.
There is a selection problem, too. The five-year return printed in a brochure belongs to a fund that survived those five years and was worth advertising. Funds that did badly get merged or simply never appear in the table you are reading.
The return figure is noisy, backward-looking, and partly self-selected. The charge figure is certain, forward-looking, and applies to your money.
What Single Number Should You Actually Be Comparing?
Reduction in Yield, usually printed as RIY.
Every unit-linked insurance plan sold in India must publish a benefit illustration showing what happens to your money at assumed gross returns of 4% and 8%, along with your net yield after every charge is deducted. The gap between the gross assumption and the net yield is the Reduction in Yield, and it is the cleanest single expression of what the product costs you.
If a plan assumes 8% gross and shows a net yield of 6.4%, its RIY is 1.6%. That bundles the premium allocation charge, policy administration charge, fund management charge, and mortality charge into one figure you can place next to another figure.
This matters because individual charges are not comparable. Plan A might have zero allocation charge and a heavier administration charge, and Plan B the reverse. Comparing line items one by one leads nowhere. Comparing RIY settles it in a single step.
Regulatory ceilings limit how bad this can get. The fund management charge is capped at 1.35% a year for regular funds, and 0.50% for the discontinued policy fund. The overall reduction in yield is capped at 3.00% at year ten and 2.25% from year fifteen. Confirm the current ceilings and the plan-specific figures in the brochure and policy document rather than any summary elsewhere.
How Much Does a 0.8% Difference Actually Cost You?
Take ₹1,50,000 a year for fifteen years, which is ₹22.5 lakh of premiums, on the standard 8% gross illustration.
Plan A, RIY 1.6%, net yield 6.4%, ends at about ₹38,30,000. Plan B, RIY 2.4%, net yield 5.6%, ends at about ₹35,76,500.
The gap is ₹2,53,500, more than a year and a half of premiums, handed over for no extra benefit because of a decision you made in four seconds off a return chart.
Stretch it to twenty years, and Plan A reaches about ₹61,29,800 against ₹55,82,400. The gap widens to ₹5,47,400, because cost compounds exactly the way returns do, only against you.
Neither plan had to outperform the other. This entire difference exists with both funds delivering identical gross returns.
What Does a Proper Side-by-Side Look Like?
| What to compare | Where to find it | Why it decides the outcome |
| Reduction in Yield at 8% gross | Benefit illustration, year 10 and year 15 rows | Single number capturing total cost |
| Fund management charge | Charges section of brochure | Applies to your whole corpus, every year |
| Premium allocation charge, years 1 to 5 | Charges section | Front-loaded, hurts most if you exit early |
| Policy administration charge and its escalation | Charges section | Often rises annually, easy to miss |
| Mortality charge and whether it is returned | Brochure and product team confirmation | Varies significantly between structures |
| Free switches per year and switch fee after | Policy document | Determines whether rebalancing is free |
| Discontinuance charge, years 1 to 5 | Charges section | Your exit cost if life intervenes |
| Number and type of fund options | Fund fact sheet | Determines whether you can rebalance at all |
Ask for both benefit illustrations at the same premium, term, and premium-paying term. If the inputs differ, the comparison is meaningless, and this is the most common way it goes wrong.
Who Should Not Pick Purely On The Lowest RIY?
Cost discipline is right, but three readers should weigh something alongside it.
If you may stop premiums early or exit before year ten, the discontinuance and allocation charge schedule matters more than the 15-year RIY. A plan that looks cheap over twenty years can be expensive over six.
If you intend to rebalance actively between equity and debt, check the free switch count and the fund range. A slightly higher RIY with genuinely useful fund options beats a cheaper plan that leaves you stuck in one equity fund through every cycle.
And if you are buying mainly for protection, RIY is the wrong lens entirely. A term plan gives far more cover per rupee. Comparing ULIP plans on cost only makes sense once you have decided you want the combined investment and cover structure at all.
Does Tax Change the Comparison Between Two Plans?
Between two unit-linked insurance plans, largely no, since both sit under the same treatment. It changes whether either makes sense at all.
Exemption on maturity proceeds depends on the policy issue date, your aggregate annual premium across all such policies, and whether the sum assured meets the required multiple of premium.
Cross the aggregate threshold, and proceeds are taxed as capital gains instead. That threshold applies across all your unit-linked policies added together, not per policy, which regularly trips up people buying a second plan. All of this is stated for FY 2026-27 and remains subject to change under the Income Tax Act, 2025 transition. Consult a qualified tax advisor for your own position.
What Should You Do Before You Sign Anything?
Get both benefit illustrations on identical inputs. Find the net yield row at year fifteen in each, subtract it from the 8% gross assumption, and you have your two RIY figures. Put them side by side.
Then, run both through a ULIP calculator with your real premium and term, and read the rupee gap at maturity rather than the percentage gap on paper. A 0.8% difference looks like a rounding error until you see it as ₹2.5 lakh.
Pick the lower RIY unless one of the three exceptions applies to you. Then, stop reading five-year return charts, because you have already taken everything useful from them, which is close to nothing.
About the Author
